Persistencia a los inhibidores de la aromatasa en la cohorte SIDIAP: mortalidad e influencia de los bifosfonatos / Persistence to aromatase inhibitors in the SIDIAP cohort: mortality and influence of bisphosphonates

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la persistencia a la terapia con inhibidores de la aromatasa (IA), la mortalidad asociada a la discontinuidad al tratamiento y la influencia de los bifosfonatos (BF) orales, en la práctica clínica habitual. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo observacional de mujeres con cáncer de mama en tratamiento con IA entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2015, registradas en la base de datos SIDIAP. Se excluyeron aquellas tratadas previamente con tamoxifeno. Se estudió la persistencia al tratamiento con IA con un análisis de supervivencia: se calculó el estimador de Kaplan-Meier, y se realizó un modelo de los riesgos proporcionales (regresión de Cox) entre usuarias y no usuarias de BF ajustando por edad. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de sensibilidad teniendo en cuenta la mortalidad como riesgo competitivo (modelos de Fine y Gray). Se comparó la diferencia de mortalidad entre grupos mediante una prueba Chi cuadrado. RESULTADOS: Se observó una persistencia a los IA del 87% a 5 años de tratamiento, con una mortalidad global del 19,75%. Se registró un 7,7% menos de mortalidad en aquellas pacientes que completaron los 5 años de tratamiento respecto a las que no. Las pacientes con BF mostraron una disminución de la mortalidad (6,6%) y una disminución del riesgo de abandono de la terapia (SHR ajustado: 0,62 [IC 95%: 0,55 a 0,70]) respecto a las no usuarias. CONCLUSIONES: La permanencia a los IA y el uso de BF está asociada a una disminución de la mortalidad global. Además, el uso de BF resulta en un aumento de la adherencia al tratamiento con IA

OBJETIVE: To assess the persistence of aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy, mortality associated with treatment discontinuation and the influence of oral bisphosphonates (BP) in routine clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of women with breast cancer undergoing AI treatment between January 2006 and December 2015, registered in the SIDIAP database. Those previously treated with tamoxifen were excluded. AI persistence was studied with a survival analysis: the Kaplan-Meier estimator was calculated, and a proportional hazards model (Cox regression) was performed between users and non-users of BP adjusting for age. A sensitivity analysis was carried out taking into account mortality as a competitive risk (Fine and Gray models). The difference in mortality between groups was compared using a Chi square test. RESULTS: A persistence to AI of 87% was observed after 5 years of treatment, with an overall mortality of 19.75%. There was 7.7% less mortality in those patients who completed the 5 years of treatment compared to those who did not. Patients with BP showed a decrease in mortality (6.6%) and a decrease in the risk of discontinuing therapy (adjusted SHR: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.55 to 0.70]) compared to non-users. CONCLUSIONS: Persistence to AI and BP use are associated with a decrease in overall mortality. Furthermore, the use of BP increases adherence to AI treatment

Changes in dietary intake, plasma carotenoids and erythrocyte membrane fatty acids in breast cancer survivors after a lifestyle intervention: results from a single-arm trial.

BACKGROUND: The influence of nutrition on breast cancer prognosis is still inconclusive and therefore dietary interventions incorporating dietary biomarkers are needed to confirm compliance with dietary goals and clarify biological mechanisms. The present study assessed whether a lifestyle intervention in breast cancer survivors could affect dietary biomarkers of fruit and vegetables and fatty acids. METHODS: In this phase II single-arm trial, 37 overweight/obese early stage breast cancer patients completed a 12-week diet and exercise intervention. The intervention involved 1-h weekly diet sessions delivered by a dietician and 75-min bi-weekly physical activity sessions of moderate-to-high intensity led by trained monitors. Before and after the intervention, three 24-h dietary recalls were carried out to calculate nutrient intakes and, in addition, blood samples were taken to measure plasma carotenoids, vitamin E and retinol concentrations and erythrocyte membrane fatty acid (EFA) composition. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to assess changes in dietary and biomarkers measurements over the intervention period. RESULTS: After the intervention, there was a significant increase in the intake of dietary carotenoids (+15.1% compared to baseline) but not plasma carotenoids levels (+6.3%). Regarding the EFA levels, we observed a significant decrease in percentage of saturated fatty acids (-1.4%) and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (-2.9%) and an increase in monounsaturated fatty acids (1.7%) and total and long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (by 13.1% and 13.7%, respectively). A favourable decrease in the ratio of long-chain n-6 to n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (-9.1%) was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: After a short-term diet and exercise intervention in overweight/obese breast cancer survivors, we observed significant changes in dietary nutrients and fatty acid biomarkers, suggesting positive dietary changes that could be relevant for breast cancer prognosis.

Estudio de la base genética de la reducción del Trabecular Bone Score relacionada con los inhibidores de la aromatasa / Study of the genetic basis of Trabecular Bone Score reduction related to aromatase inhibitors

Objetivos: Los inhibidores de la aromatasa (AI) son terapias endocrinas adyuvantes eficaces para pacientes con cáncer de mama, aunque se han asociado a un mayor riesgo de fractura osteoporótica. Previamente se ha demostrado una pérdida en el Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) que puede variar entre las pacientes tratadas con IA. El estudio pretendió identificar la base genética asociada al cambio en el TBS mediante el estudio de genes de la vía esteroidogénica. Material y métodos: La cohorte B-ABLE estudia de forma prospectiva a mujeres postmenopáusicas con cáncer de mama en tratamiento con IA. Se calculó el TBS a partir de los datos adquiridos en la densitometría mediante absorciometría radiológica dual (DXA) realizada al inicio y al final del tratamiento con IA. El cambio relativo del TBS se calculó como la variación porcentual del valor de TBS al final de tratamiento respecto al TBS basal. Para estudiar la posible asociación genética se genotiparon los polimorfismos de cambio de un nucleótido (SNPs) en los genes CYP11A1, CYP17A1, HDE3B2, HDE17B3, CYP19A1, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, ESR1, GC, CYP27B1, VDR y CYP24A1. Se estudió mediante regresión lineal múltiple la posible relación entre genes y cambios en TBS contemplando los modelos de herencia genética dominante, recesivo y aditivo. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio un total de 212 mujeres no tratadas con bisfosfonatos en las que pudo calcularse el TBS. La mitad de las pacientes habían recibido tratamiento previo con tamoxifeno. El porcentaje de cambio intra-individual del TBS fue del -0,04% [IC del 95%: -0,05 a -0,03; p<0,001] al final de tratamiento con IA. El SNP rs6013897 en el gen CYP24A1 mostró una asociación significativa con la reducción del TBS [p=0,03565; coeficiente Beta (IC del 95%) = -1,55 (-2,98 a -0,11)]. Conclusiones: El gen CYP24A1 podría estar implicado en la variabilidad fenotípica encontrada en el deterioro de la microarquitectura ósea durante el tratamiento con IA

Objectives: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are effective adjuvant endocrine therapies for breast cancer patients, although they have been associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) loss has been previously demonstrated, although it may vary among AI-treated patients. This study aims to identify the genetic basis associated with TBS change by studying steroidogenic pathway genes. Material and methods: The B-ABLE cohort studies prospectively postmenopausal women with breast cancer under treatment with AI. TBS is calculated from the raw data acquired in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at the outset of the study and at the end of AI-treatment. The relative TBS change was calculated as the percentage variation of the TBS value at the end of treatment from baseline. To study the possible genetic association, nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped in genes CYP11A1, CYP17A1, HDE3B2, HDE17B3, CYP19A1, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, ESR1, GC, CYP27B1, VDR and CYP24A1. The possible relationship between genes and TBS changes was studied by multiple linear regression, considering models of dominant, recessive and additive genetic inheritance. Results: The study included 212 women that had not been treated with bisphosphonates and had available TBS data. Half of the patients had been treated previously with tamoxifen. The percentage of intra-individual TBS change was -0.04% [95% CI: -0.05 to -0.03; p<0.001] at the end of AI treatment. The SNP rs6013897 in the gene CYP24A1 showed a significant association with TBS reduction [p=0.03565; coefficient Beta (95% CI) = -1.55 (-2.98 to -0.11)]. Conclusions: The CYP24A1 gene could be involved in the phenotypic variability found in bone microarchitecture deterioration during AI treatment

Análisis genético de enzimas de la vía esteroidal asociadas a efectos adversos musculoesqueléticos de los inhibidores de la aromatasa / Genetic analysis of steroid pathway enzymes associated with adverse musculoskeletal effects of aromatase inhibitors

Objetivos: Identificar putativas variantes funcionales en los genes CYP11A1 y CYP17A1 asociadas a efectos musculoesqueléticos (pérdida acelerada de la masa ósea y artralgias) derivados del tratamiento con inhibidores de la aromatasa (IA). Material y métodos: La cohorte B-ABLE es un estudio prospectivo de mujeres postmenopáusicas con cáncer de mama en tratamiento con IA. La densidad mineral ósea en columna lumbar y cuello femoral se midió mediante densitometría, y el dolor articular mediante escala analógica visual. A partir de polimorfismos de cambio de un nucleótido (SNPs) en los genes CYP11A1 (rs4077581, rs11632698 y rs900798) y CYP17A1 (rs4919686, rs4919683, rs4919687, rs3781287, rs10786712, rs6163, rs743572), asociados previamente con eventos musculoesqueléticos, se construyeron los haplotipos para cada paciente de la cohorte, y se seleccionaron aquellos que mostraron mayor diferencia fenotípica (p<0,05). Dentro de cada haplotipo, se eligieron aquellas pacientes con fenotipos extremos para la secuenciación de los respectivos genes y la identificación de variantes genéticas funcionales. Finalmente, se realizó un análisis de regresión lineal múltiple contemplando los modelos de herencia genética dominante, recesivo y aditivo. Resultados: No se encontró ninguna mutación en las regiones codificantes. En la región del promotor basal del gen CYP11A1 se encontró una variante genética (D15S520) asociada a la pérdida de masa ósea del cuello de fémur a los 24 meses de tratamiento con IA. Conclusiones: Variantes en regiones reguladoras del gen CYP11A1 podrían modular la expresión de este gen, explicando así parte de la variabilidad fenotípica encontrada en la pérdida de hueso de las pacientes en tratamiento con IA (AU)

Objetives: Identify putative functional variants in the CYP11A1 and CYP17A1 genes associated with musculoskeletal effects (accelerated bone mass loss and arthralgia) derived from treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AI). Material and methods: The B-ABLE cohort is a prospective study of postmenopausal women with breast cancer undergoing AI treatment. Bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured by densitometry and joint pain using visual analogue scale. From single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes CYP11A1 (rs4077581, rs11632698 and rs900798) and CYP17A1 (rs4919686, rs4919683, rs4919687, rs3781287, rs10786712, rs6163, rs743572), previously associated with musculoskeletal events, haplotypes were constructed for each pacient from the cohort, and those haplotypes that showed greatest phenotypic differences were chosen (p<0.05). Within each haplotype, patients with extreme phenotypes were chosen for the sequencing of respective genes and identifying functional genetic variants. Finally, a multiple linear regression analysis was carried out considering the models of dominant, recessive and additive genetic inheritance. Results: No mutation was found in coding regions. A genetic variant (D15S520), in the basal promoter region of gene CYP11A1, was found associated with femoral neck bone loss at 24 month of AI treatment. Conclusions: Variants in regulatory regions of the CYP11A1 gene could modulate the expression of this gene, thus explaining part of the phenotypic variability found in bone loss of patients undergoing AI treatment (AU)

Evolución de la DMO durante el tratamiento con inhibidores de aromatasa y su relación con el gen CYP11A1: estudio prospectivo de la cohorte B-ABLE / BMD evolution during treatment with aromatase inhibitors and its relation to the CYP11A1 gene: prospective study in the B-ABLE cohort

Objetivos: El objetivo del estudio fue analizar los cambios en la densidad mineral ósea (DMO) a lo largo del tratamiento con inhibidores de aromatasa (IA) en la práctica clínica y evaluar la asociación entre el gen CYP11A1 y la variación de DMO al final del tratamiento. Material y métodos: La cohorte B-ABLE es un estudio prospectivo de mujeres postmenopáusicas con cáncer de mama, en tratamiento con IA. Se analizó la variación de DMO durante todo el tratamiento con IA, así como las diferencias entre las pacientes tratadas y no-tratadas previamente con tamoxifeno (TMX). Tres polimorfismos (rs4077581, rs11632698 y rs900798) del gen CYP11A1, fueron genotipados para su asociación con la variación de DMO. Resultados: Las pacientes tratadas con TMX mostraron pérdidas más aceleradas de DMO que las no tratadas previamente con TMX (60% menos en columna y 46% en fémur a los 2 años y 70% menos en columna y 63% en fémur a los 3 años). No obstante, al final del tratamiento no se detectaron diferencias significativas en la pérdida de DMO entre ambos grupos de pacientes. Los 3 polimorfismos del gen CYP11A1 resultaron significativamente asociados a la variación de DMO en fémur al final del tratamiento. Conclusiones: La DMO disminuyó de forma más acelerada en las pacientes con tratamiento previo con TMX que en las que solo recibieron AI, a pesar de que no se detectaron diferencias significativas al final de tratamiento. Polimorfismos en el gen CYP11A1 están relacionados con la variación de la DMO en respuesta al tratamiento con IA (AU)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze bone mineral density (BMD) changes throughout aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment in clinical cases and also consider its association with the CYP11A1 gene and the BMD variation after treatment. Material and methods: The B-ABLE cohort is a prospective study of postmenopausal women with breast cancer, in AI treatment. BMD variation was analyzed during AI treatment, as well as the differences those patients who were treated and not treated previously with tamoxifen (TMX). Three polymorphisms (rs4077581, rs11632698 and rs900798) of the CYP11A1 gene were genotyped for their association with BMD variation. Results: TMX-treated patients presented more rapid BMD loss than those who did not undergo prior TMX treatment (60% less in spine and 46% in femur at 2 years and 70% less in the spine and 63% in the femur at 3 years). However, no significant BMD loss was detected after treatment in either group. The 3 CYP11A1 gene polymorphisms were significantly associated with BMD variation in the femur at the end of the treatment. Conclusions: BMD was reduced more rapidly in patients with prior TMX treatment than in those who only received AI, although no significant differences were detected after treatment. The 3 CYP11A1 gene polymorphisms were associated with BMD variation in response to AI treatment (AU)

CYP11A1 expression in bone is associated with aromatase inhibitor-related bone loss.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) used as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer cause diverse musculoskeletal side effects that include bone loss and its associated fracture. About half of the 391 patients treated with AIs in the Barcelona-Aromatase induced bone loss in early breast cancer cohort suffered a significant bone loss at lumbar spine (LS) and/or femoral neck (FN) after 2 years on AI-treatment. In contrast, up to one-third (19.6% LS, 38.6% FN) showed no decline or even increased bone density. The present study aimed to determine the genetic basis for this variability. SNPs in candidate genes involved in vitamin D and estrogen hormone-response pathways (CYP11A1, CYP17A1, HSD3B2, HSD17B3, CYP19A1, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, ESR1, DHCR7, GC, CYP2R1, CYP27B1, VDR and CYP24A1) were genotyped for association analysis with AI-related bone loss (AIBL). After multiple testing correction, 3 tag-SNPs (rs4077581, s11632698 and rs900798) located in the CYP11A1 gene were significantly associated (P<0.005) with FN AIBL at 2 years of treatment. Next, CYP11A1 expression in human fresh bone tissue and primary osteoblasts was demonstrated by RT-PCR. Both common isoforms of human cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (encoded by CYP11A1 gene) were detected in osteoblasts by western blot. In conclusion, the genetic association of CYP11A1 gene with AIBL and its expression in bone tissue reveals a potential local function of this enzyme in bone metabolism regulation, offering a new vision of the steroidogenic ability of this tissue and new understanding of AI-induced bone loss.

SEOM Clinical Guidelines for the systemic treatment of early breast cancer 2013

The purpose of this article is to update our previous work on the treatment and follow-up in early breast cancer. In this new version we have classified a treatment by immunohistochemistry subtypes of breast cancer. Latest advances in the management of this disease have been compiled, either in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting or chemotherapy and hormonal treatment. This review is presented in an easy way for oncologist, fellows and for other specialties (AU)

SEOM clinical guidelines for the systemic treatment of early breast cancer 2013.

The purpose of this article is to update our previous work on the treatment and follow-up in early breast cancer. In this new version we have classified a treatment by immunohistochemistry subtypes of breast cancer. Latest advances in the management of this disease have been compiled, either in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting or chemotherapy and hormonal treatment. This review is presented in an easy way for oncologist, fellows and for other specialties.

Finding the right dose of fulvestrant in breast cancer.

Fulvestrant is a selective estrogen receptor downregulator, behaving as a complete antagonist. It was initially approved, at a dose of 250 mg, to treat hormone dependant breast cancer in second line setting. However, a series of pharmacological and pre-clinical studies have suggested that a higher dose of 500 mg may be more effective. The present work summarizes and discusses clinical trials that have aimed to test the benefits of administering fulvestrant at a higher dose. The data support the use of a higher, and more possibly, effective dose of the agent.

Prescription refill, patient self-report and physician report in assessing adherence to oral endocrine therapy in early breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study in Catalonia, Spain.

AIMS: To compare different methods in order to assess adherence and persistence with oral endocrine therapy in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) in Catalonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study covered all women newly diagnosed with stage I, II or IIIa BC and positive hormone receptors at six hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) in 2004. Adherence was assessed on the basis of physician report and patient self-report using a telephone questionnaire. Persistence was measured by refill prescriptions. We used the Kappa index to compare adherence measures and logistic regression to evaluate adherence-related risk factors. RESULTS: The study covered a total of 692 women. Adherence ranged from 92% (self-report) to 94.7% (physician report), depending on the measure used; persistence was 74.7% at 5 years of follow-up. Low concordance between measures was observed (Kappa range: 0.018-0.267). Patients aged 50-74 years showed higher adherence than those aged <50 years. Adherence was also associated with: adjuvant chemotherapy and sequential hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between the different measures was remarkably low, indicating the need for further research. Adherence is an issue in the management of BC patients taking oral drugs, and should be assessed in clinical practice.

Nuclear PARP-1 protein overexpression is associated with poor overall survival in early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is a highly promising novel target in breast cancer. However, the expression of PARP-1 protein in breast cancer and its associations with outcome are yet poorly characterized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quantitative expression of PARP-1 protein was assayed by a specific immunohistochemical signal intensity scanning assay in a range of normal to malignant breast lesions, including a series of patients (N = 330) with operable breast cancer to correlate with clinicopathological factors and long-term outcome. RESULTS: PARP-1 was overexpressed in about a third of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating breast carcinomas. PARP-1 protein overexpression was associated to higher tumor grade (P = 0.01), estrogen-negative tumors (P < 0.001) and triple-negative phenotype (P < 0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) for death in patients with PARP-1 overexpressing tumors was 7.24 (95% CI; 3.56-14.75). In a multivariate analysis, PARP-1 overexpression was an independent prognostic factor for both disease-free (HR 10.05; 95% CI 5.42-10.66) and overall survival (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.32-2.52). CONCLUSIONS: Nuclear PARP-1 is overexpressed during the malignant transformation of the breast, particularly in triple-negative tumors, and independently predicts poor prognosis in operable invasive breast cancer.

Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) node-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the impact of the Recurrence Score (RS) in Spanish breast cancer patients and explored the associations between clinicopathological markers and likelihood of change in treatment recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrollment was offered consecutively to eligible women with estrogen receptor-positive; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-negative breast cancer. Oncologists recorded treatment recommendation and confidence in it before and after knowing the patient's RS. RESULTS: Treatment recommendation changed in 32% of 107 patients enrolled: in 21% from chemohormonal (CHT) to hormonal therapy (HT) and in 11% from HT to CHT. RS was associated with the likelihood of change from HT to CHT (P < 0.001) and from CHT to HT (P < 0.001). Confidence of oncologists in treatment recommendations increased for 60% of cases. Higher tumor grade (P = 0.007) and a high proliferative index (Ki-67) (P = 0.023) were significantly associated with a greater chance of changing from HT to CHT, while positive progesterone receptor status (P = 0.002) with a greater probability of changing from CHT to HT. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the first prospective European study are consistent with published experience and use of the RS as proposed in European clinical practice guidelines and provide evidence on how Oncotype DX and clinicopathological factors are complementary and patient selection may be improved.

Current controversies in the management of breast cancer.

The following manuscript summarises the content of the Breast Symposium that was held in May 2008 in Barcelona in which four controversies regarding the management of breast cancer were discussed. The design of the symposium included two speakers per controversy, one in favour and one diverging, and the audience had to vote before and after the presentations to assess changes in the participants' views. The four controversies included: (1) the role of non-conventional predictive factors in selecting treatment for breast cancer; (2) the role of surgery in disseminated disease; (3) are taxanes indicated in the adjuvant treatment of patients with lymph-node-negative disease?; (4) is treatment with tamoxifen (TAM) always required after surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)? The symposium concluded with the presentation titled: 'Features of a well designed clinical trial in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer'.

Current controversies in the management of breast cancer

The following manuscript summarises the content of the Breast Symposium that was held in May 2008 in Barcelona in which four controversies regarding the management of breast cancer were discussed. The design of the symposium included two speakers per controversy, one in favour and one diverging, and the audience had to vote before and after the presentations to assess changes in the participants' views. The four controversies included: (1) the role of non-conventional predictive factors in selecting treatment for breast cancer; (2) the role of surgery in disseminated disease; (3) are taxanes indicated in the adjuvant treatment of patients with lymph-node-negative disease?; (4) is treatment with tamoxifen (TAM) always required after surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)? The symposium concluded with the presentation titled: 'Features of a well designed clinical trial in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer' (AU)

No disponible

Supportive care for patients with early breast cancer

Breast cancer treatment currently requires the joint efforts of a multidisciplinary team to effectively combine chemotherapy, hormone therapy, biological agents, surgery and radiation therapy when needed. To develop such a treatment plan, it is important to know the benefits as well as the potential toxic effects of each therapy. Thus, many patients with early breast cancer complain of collateral adverse events such as fatigue, nausea, vomiting, loss of libido, hot flashes, night sweats or neuropathy due to the complex therapies they are receiving. To date, the treatment of such symptoms is an important issue that greatly affects the quality of life of these patients. In this review, we report the content of a multi-expert meeting where the incidence of and medical approach to some of the most common adverse events encountered during the treatment of patients with early breast cancer were analysed (AU)

Exemestane as primary treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a phase II trial.

To assess the efficacy of exemestane as neoadjuvant treatment, 55 postmenopausal women (mean age: 76 years; range: 66-86) with oestrogen-positive non-metastatic breast tumour and ineligible for conservative surgery were recruited into this phase II trial to receive oral exemestane (25 mg day(-1)) for 6 months. Tumour response was evaluated by clinical examination, mammography and breast ultrasound every 2 months (RECIST criteria). Overall clinical response to treatment was observed in 33/54 patients (61.1%; 95% CI: 48.1-74.0). Radiological responses in 45 evaluable patients were partial response in 23, stable disease in 21 and disease progression in one. Median time to surgery from the commencement of treatment was 7 months; conservative surgery in 24 patients (55.8%) and mastectomy in 19 patients (34.5%); no surgery (patient choice or considered not suitable by attending physician) in 12 patients. Pathologic complete response was observed in breast and axilla in one patient (2.3%) and different forms of persistent disease in 23 (53.5%) patients. Treatment tolerance was good. No patient withdrew from the study because of toxic events. We conclude that exemestane as a primary treatment is feasible and very active in elderly patients with large-sized breast cancer tumour. Conservative surgery is feasible in responding patients. No severe adverse events were detected. The optimal hormonal treatment schedule remains to be determined.

Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment for metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. Final results of a phase I/II trial.

Doxorubicin and gemcitabine are active as single agents in breast cancer, have different mechanisms of action, and mainly have non-overlapping side effects. Dose-dependent doxorubicin-related cardiac toxicity is the principal limitation in the metastatic setting. This open, multicenter, single-arm phase I/II study assessed the safety and activity of gemcitabine in combination with non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet), a more cardiac-friendly anthracycline, in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer. We aimed to determine the optimal recommended dose (RD) of gemcitabine combined with Myocet in a population, with performance status >or=2 and LVEF >or=50%. A formal phase II study was performed afterwards. A total of 53 patients were recruited. Gemcitabine 900 mg/m(2) intravenously day 1 and 8 combined with Myocet 55 mg/m(2) intravenously day 1, every 21 days, was the final RD. The principal toxicity observed was hematological, and 48% of patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia. Other toxicities were mild and infrequent, including nausea and vomiting. There were no symptomatic cardiac events despite the fact that 36% of the patients had received prior treatment with adjuvant anthracyclines. Objective responses were observed in 51.1% of 47 evaluable patients (95% CI: 36-66%), including two complete response. In addition, 14 patients (29.8%) demonstrated stable disease. The combination of Myocet and gemcitabine at the RD is safe and has encouraging clinical activity in patients with advanced breast cancer, without apparent cardiac toxicity in anthracycline-pretreated patients. These data support further development of this combination.

Current controversies in the management of early breast cancer.

Medical professionals in general, and medical oncologists in particular, have highly stressful practices because they are under constant pressure to have the highest-quality, up-to-date evidence available in order to make the right decision for each individual patient. From a practical point of view, being updated on oncological and other medical specialties may seem an insurmountable task because the number of scientific publications has increased dramatically. The use of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials or the application of results obtained from high-quality randomised controlled trials are some of the most common ways to address this need. Unfortunately, they do not cover all complex clinical situations that the majority of medical oncologists face in their outpatient consultations. In this review, we report the conclusions achieved in a multiexpert meeting where five important controversies in the treatment of breast cancer were analysed. Five highly experienced medical oncologists were required to defend an affirmative answer and another five were required to defend a negative answer for each of the clinical questions. After that, a one-day meeting was organised to debate each clinical question and to reach a consensus. We report here the content of this multi-expert meeting along with the conclusions drawn.

Current controversies in the management of early breast cancer

Medical professionals in general, and medical oncologists in particular, have highly stressful practices because they are under constant pressure to have the highest-quality, up-to-date evidence available in order to make the right decision for each individual patient. From a practical point of view, being updated on oncological and other medical specialties may seem an insurmountable task because the number of scientific publications has increased dramatically. The use of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials or the application of results obtained from high-quality randomised controlled trials are some of the most common ways to address this need. Unfortunately, they do not cover all complex clinical situations that the majority of medical oncologists face in their outpatient consultations. In this review, we report the conclusions achieved in a multiexpert meeting where five important controversies in the treatment of breast cancer were analysed. Five highly experienced medical oncologists were required to defend an affirmative answer and another five were required to defend a negative answer for each of the clinical questions. After that, a one-day meeting was organised to debate each clinical question and to reach a consensus. We report here the content of this multi-expert meeting along with the conclusions drawn (AU)